In my science classes,
my students are often required to learned and manipulate processes that occur
in nature. One such unit that is coming
up in my environmental science classes involves natural cycles that exist in
the environment, for example, the water cycle (that is the one that most people
are familiar with).
I can take a textual description of this or
another cycle and process it in my mind and understand what is going on. I also spend tens of thousands of dollars and
hundreds of hours of time studying ecology, human geography, geophysics,
environmental and biochemistry, etc. to be able to do that. Imagine asking a high school student to read
the same passage and process the information!
I have never tried to teach this unit using textual descriptions
alone. The cycles are too complex to describe
using only words. Diagrams not only
allow users to process large amounts of information quickly, but can also give
students an image that they can hold in their minds. There are also animations out there that will
guide users through particular cycles. The
diagrams work best if you require students to explain the cycle verbally, i.e.
tell someone else what is going on in the cycle, and through writing. Technology can be helpful in this regard
because students would be able to use simulations or animations of the
different cycles. For example, you could
follow the water cycle from the perspective of a drop of water. The simulated movement of the animation would
help show the orderly process of going through the cycle and how the different
parts are connected. They can also be
tied to interactive exercises that help support retention and application of
knowledge. Viewing animations and participating
in interactive activities could be useful for students at the beginning of
their exploration of the cycles, before the teacher and students have had a
chance to discuss the cycles and their importance to the environment and
humans. They can also be used as
supports for information provided by the teacher. The challenge would come in determining the
best time to use the animations and making sure that the information contained
within the animations fits within the scope of the lesson you are
teaching. Unless you make your own
animations/videos, you will be at the mercy of the original makers as far as
the information provided. Incorporating
the animations at an additional tool/instructional object, while using content
delivered primarily by the teacher, would alleviate some of these
problems. I ended up reading several of
the chapters and drew from them, mostly ch. 29, 30, and 32.
The use of diagrams, animations, and videos are also useful in order to achieve various educational
goals (ch. 38) and increase accessibility of information (ch. 36). They can be used in guided instructional settings,
where the teacher formally guides students through the material in a more
traditional educational setting, i.e. I talk, use the diagram as a visual aide
and the students follow me. They can
also be modified to allow students to explore the information on their own in
order to create initial conclusions before formally discussing the
content. That way, the students can
create prior knowledge that the teacher can draw from when formally discussing
content. Informal, student-centered
discovery and exploration may not be the best methods in terms of acquisition
and retention of information but they are ways to allows students to create
connections with their own previous knowledge in a way that works best within
their particular schema. Students can
work within their developmental, linguistic, physiological, and neurological
limitations if allowed develop their own connections to the content being
taught, under the guidance of the teacher.
It is true that a child needs close guidance from a teacher, parent, or
other adults when learning something brand new.
However, students also need room to flex their newly acquired information
in novel ways that more closely mimics real-world applications. This can also lead to increased student engagement,
since the students are developing new knowledge in a way that “works” for
them. Student engagement is a very strong
predictor of student success.

Excellent work!
ReplyDelete